<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo: Search is history?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bomega.com/2007/06/06/yahoo-search-is-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bomega.com/2007/06/06/yahoo-search-is-history/</link>
	<description>Internet Entrepreneur, Public Speaker, Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:49:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Boris Veldhuijzen van Zanten</title>
		<link>http://bomega.com/2007/06/06/yahoo-search-is-history/comment-page-1/#comment-9019</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris Veldhuijzen van Zanten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bomega.com/2007/06/06/yahoo-search-is-history/#comment-9019</guid>
		<description>Nice OpenIdea Roel!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice OpenIdea Roel!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roel</title>
		<link>http://bomega.com/2007/06/06/yahoo-search-is-history/comment-page-1/#comment-9011</link>
		<dc:creator>Roel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bomega.com/2007/06/06/yahoo-search-is-history/#comment-9011</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a fact that a lot of journalists modify or ignore (essential) parts of news stories. Or they simply don&#039;t understand the subject. I noticed something similar on Monday on nu.nl, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://roelgroeneveld.com/leer-anoniem-internetten&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blogged about it&lt;/a&gt; (in Dutch). 

Here&#039;s an OpenIdea: why not create a site that let&#039;s anyone post corrections on news items. In Web2.0 style it should off course be called NewsCorrectr. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a fact that a lot of journalists modify or ignore (essential) parts of news stories. Or they simply don&#8217;t understand the subject. I noticed something similar on Monday on nu.nl, and <a href="http://roelgroeneveld.com/leer-anoniem-internetten" rel="nofollow">blogged about it</a> (in Dutch). </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an OpenIdea: why not create a site that let&#8217;s anyone post corrections on news items. In Web2.0 style it should off course be called NewsCorrectr. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
