Comments on: The Slurpr - Mother Of All Wi-fi Access Points! http://bomega.com/2007/05/29/the-slurpr-mother-of-all-wi-fi-access-points/ Internet Entrepreneur, Public Speaker, Blogger Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:59:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: T1 High Speed Internet http://bomega.com/2007/05/29/the-slurpr-mother-of-all-wi-fi-access-points/#comment-9860 T1 High Speed Internet Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:11:42 +0000 http://www.bomega.com/2007/05/29/the-slurpr-mother-of-all-wi-fi-access-points/#comment-9860 Wi-fi internet access has some security issue, but T1 high speed internet is the preferred broadband communications because it is more secure Wi-fi internet access has some security issue, but T1 high speed internet is the preferred broadband communications because it is more secure

]]> By: User User http://bomega.com/2007/05/29/the-slurpr-mother-of-all-wi-fi-access-points/#comment-8976 User User Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:42:24 +0000 http://www.bomega.com/2007/05/29/the-slurpr-mother-of-all-wi-fi-access-points/#comment-8976 Well ? What is the answer ? Do the benefits of multiple bandwidth aggregation only work when you are doing multi-stream transfers of data ? As far as I can tell, if I download a single file over FTP, I can only run that TCP session through one of the WIFI networks I am connected to - I can't split it up across multiple connections because the server on the other end won't know how to reassemble them ... comments ? Well ? What is the answer ? Do the benefits of multiple bandwidth aggregation only work when you are doing multi-stream transfers of data ?

As far as I can tell, if I download a single file over FTP, I can only run that TCP session through one of the WIFI networks I am connected to - I can’t split it up across multiple connections because the server on the other end won’t know how to reassemble them …

comments ?

]]> By: Huub Koch http://bomega.com/2007/05/29/the-slurpr-mother-of-all-wi-fi-access-points/#comment-8954 Huub Koch Thu, 31 May 2007 14:43:12 +0000 http://www.bomega.com/2007/05/29/the-slurpr-mother-of-all-wi-fi-access-points/#comment-8954 Which means: Keep us posted on this subject! Which means: Keep us posted on this subject!

]]> By: Fact http://bomega.com/2007/05/29/the-slurpr-mother-of-all-wi-fi-access-points/#comment-8952 Fact Wed, 30 May 2007 04:12:20 +0000 http://www.bomega.com/2007/05/29/the-slurpr-mother-of-all-wi-fi-access-points/#comment-8952 I would think this a good thing, you're taking less bandwidth from each person. So no one would even notice. I would think this a good thing, you’re taking less bandwidth from each person. So no one would even notice.

]]> By: Wilco http://bomega.com/2007/05/29/the-slurpr-mother-of-all-wi-fi-access-points/#comment-8951 Wilco Tue, 29 May 2007 22:05:13 +0000 http://www.bomega.com/2007/05/29/the-slurpr-mother-of-all-wi-fi-access-points/#comment-8951 This is quite the ingenious invention! My Airport connection never is up to par, and for some reason neighboring signals can be stronger than mine. So I suppose I'm in the same boat... We'll have to see what the budget permits here :) This is quite the ingenious invention! My Airport connection never is up to par, and for some reason neighboring signals can be stronger than mine. So I suppose I’m in the same boat… We’ll have to see what the budget permits here :)

]]> By: David Petherick http://bomega.com/2007/05/29/the-slurpr-mother-of-all-wi-fi-access-points/#comment-8950 David Petherick Tue, 29 May 2007 17:02:04 +0000 http://www.bomega.com/2007/05/29/the-slurpr-mother-of-all-wi-fi-access-points/#comment-8950 I've ordered six. ;-) I’ve ordered six. ;-)

]]> By: Tony Blair http://bomega.com/2007/05/29/the-slurpr-mother-of-all-wi-fi-access-points/#comment-8949 Tony Blair Tue, 29 May 2007 16:50:02 +0000 http://www.bomega.com/2007/05/29/the-slurpr-mother-of-all-wi-fi-access-points/#comment-8949 I'll be very anxious to hear the answer to the question above this one about combined bandwidth, but I have a question of my own. If its not WEP crackable right out of the box...could you at least provide step by step instructions on how to make it WEP crackable. PLEASE MAKE IT WEP CRACKABLE OUT OF THE BOX :) I’ll be very anxious to hear the answer to the question above this one about combined bandwidth, but I have a question of my own. If its not WEP crackable right out of the box…could you at least provide step by step instructions on how to make it WEP crackable.

PLEASE MAKE IT WEP CRACKABLE OUT OF THE BOX :)

]]> By: User User http://bomega.com/2007/05/29/the-slurpr-mother-of-all-wi-fi-access-points/#comment-8948 User User Tue, 29 May 2007 15:13:19 +0000 http://www.bomega.com/2007/05/29/the-slurpr-mother-of-all-wi-fi-access-points/#comment-8948 Ok, but how does it re-aggregate the connections ? As far as I can tell, five different wireless connections will only be faster than a single connection if you are running multiple connections and services. But what if you are downloading a single file from a single ftp site ? You can't establish a many-to-one connection to a single site .... which means you only get to talk over one of the wireless networks you are attached to. Theoretically you could have a connection aggregation server (proxy server, tor) running at a datacenter, and then re-aggregate there, but ,,, that's getting fairly complex. So am I correct ? Increased throughput is only realized if you are running multiple different connections simultaneously ? ALSO, can each network connection be configured to use X % of available bandwidth ? So that anon, open wireless nets I connect to don't notice I am there (because I am only using 20% of their bandwidth) ? Ok, but how does it re-aggregate the connections ?

As far as I can tell, five different wireless connections will only be faster than a single connection if you are running multiple connections and services.

But what if you are downloading a single file from a single ftp site ? You can’t establish a many-to-one connection to a single site …. which means you only get to talk over one of the wireless networks you are attached to.

Theoretically you could have a connection aggregation server (proxy server, tor) running at a datacenter, and then re-aggregate there, but ,,, that’s getting fairly complex.

So am I correct ? Increased throughput is only realized if you are running multiple different connections simultaneously ?

ALSO, can each network connection be configured to use X % of available bandwidth ? So that anon, open wireless nets I connect to don’t notice I am there (because I am only using 20% of their bandwidth) ?

]]>