<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Ongoing Fight Against Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bomega.com/2007/01/05/the-ongoing-fight-against-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bomega.com/2007/01/05/the-ongoing-fight-against-spam/</link>
	<description>Internet Entrepreneur, Public Speaker, Blogger</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Gras</title>
		<link>http://bomega.com/2007/01/05/the-ongoing-fight-against-spam/#comment-1627</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Gras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bomega.com/2007/01/05/the-ongoing-fight-against-spam/#comment-1627</guid>
		<description>My solution to spam is to do greylisting: http://greylisting.org/ . It works near-perfectly against spam, with in theory no false positives, although
it has (to me, minor) drawbacks. It does have to run on the machine(s) receiving the mail though (mxes). I don't have exact numbers but it's made my mail from near-unusable (after being scanned by spamassassin and a tuned bogofilter) to near-perfect for the greylisted address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My solution to spam is to do greylisting: <a href="http://greylisting.org/" rel="nofollow">http://greylisting.org/</a> . It works near-perfectly against spam, with in theory no false positives, although<br />
it has (to me, minor) drawbacks. It does have to run on the machine(s) receiving the mail though (mxes). I don&#8217;t have exact numbers but it&#8217;s made my mail from near-unusable (after being scanned by spamassassin and a tuned bogofilter) to near-perfect for the greylisted address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
