<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 600.000 racists?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bomega.com/2006/11/23/600000-racists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bomega.com/2006/11/23/600000-racists/</link>
	<description>Internet Entrepreneur, Public Speaker, Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:21:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo ViÃ«tor</title>
		<link>http://bomega.com/2006/11/23/600000-racists/comment-page-1/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo ViÃ«tor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 09:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bomega.com/2006/11/23/600000-racists/#comment-489</guid>
		<description>Lucky you to get some coffee on the house.
The last time I could not get in, was because of a guy from TunesiÃ« - living in the Netherlands - who had robbed me and taken my keys and my money.
I think some people can handle all situations, also freedom of migration, while others florish in a more protected environment.
For many preople living in the Netherlands it is a threathening idea if borders are open to everyone. Geert Wilders gives them a voice.
This is only justified in a democracy. I myself find it very difficult to relate to globalisation, to different cultures, but I did not vote for PvdV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucky you to get some coffee on the house.<br />
The last time I could not get in, was because of a guy from TunesiÃ« &#8211; living in the Netherlands &#8211; who had robbed me and taken my keys and my money.<br />
I think some people can handle all situations, also freedom of migration, while others florish in a more protected environment.<br />
For many preople living in the Netherlands it is a threathening idea if borders are open to everyone. Geert Wilders gives them a voice.<br />
This is only justified in a democracy. I myself find it very difficult to relate to globalisation, to different cultures, but I did not vote for PvdV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michiel Ebberink</title>
		<link>http://bomega.com/2006/11/23/600000-racists/comment-page-1/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>Michiel Ebberink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bomega.com/2006/11/23/600000-racists/#comment-452</guid>
		<description>I agree with Reinier Zwitserloot on this matter....and I voted PvdD (party for the Animals).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Reinier Zwitserloot on this matter&#8230;.and I voted PvdD (party for the Animals).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reinier Zwitserloot</title>
		<link>http://bomega.com/2006/11/23/600000-racists/comment-page-1/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Reinier Zwitserloot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bomega.com/2006/11/23/600000-racists/#comment-444</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think its bad news at all. First off, if you asked me before the elections how many &#039;light&#039; racists (in the sense they don&#039;t actively don some pointy hats and bedsheets and know their way around torches) this country has, I&#039;d peg it around half a million already. This confirms something that already existed.

So, the shock is actually a good thing: people who weren&#039;t aware now know. This is good. There are 600k people who voted PvdV. The publication of such a number is good news, then.

But, are they all racist? Let&#039;s see, Geert Wilders is the only relevant party that tries to tackle bureaucratic inefficiencies, and given the current political climate of the Netherlands, there is no -WAY- that actual racistic measures get implemented. The &#039;cordon sanitaire&#039; around his party (no other party is willing to suffer the PvdV in a coalition) highlights the truth of that notion.

It&#039;s a dangerous ploy, but some of those 600k might just be &#039;tactical&#039; votes. That should be worth about 50k votes.

Playing devil&#039;s advocate for a moment, I think calling PvdV policies &#039;racistic&#039; is overstating somewhat. Something like &#039;Vlaams Blok&#039; is far larger and much worse, policy-wise. I do not doubt a landslide victory for PvdV might lead to a slippery slope best avoided, but a vote for PvdV&#039;s immigration policy right now could simply be a vote only for the policies as they were stated right now (which, while harsh, aren&#039;t racist just yet) - not what we all suspect would happen if PvdV was allowed to pilot this country on its own. That should be worth another 200k.

Leaves 350k, well below what I suspected. More good news, in other words.

I think a much more telling sign of PvdV&#039;s ironic name is that they support the newly instated identification laws (requiring you to identify yourself with a government-sanctioned document when asked by police or risk a fine), and they consider fighting terrorism to be more important than preserving civil liberties. How&#039;s that supporting &#039;Freedom&#039; exactly? Suggests to me similar practices as &#039;the democratic republic of congo&#039;, or the &#039;democratic people&#039;s republic of korea&#039;. A name which actually opposes what&#039;s happening.

Then again, the only political parties that -actually- favoured freedom over freedom-restriction legislature were D&#039;66, Groen Links, and the party for animals. One 3-seat (200,000 votes) has-been, environmentalists (450,000 votes) and extreme environmentalists (140,000 votes). Hm.

That scared me somewhat more - I was not aware the Dutch didn&#039;t  care about this issue, nor was I aware the political parties are scared and chasing America in overreacting on issues like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think its bad news at all. First off, if you asked me before the elections how many &#8216;light&#8217; racists (in the sense they don&#8217;t actively don some pointy hats and bedsheets and know their way around torches) this country has, I&#8217;d peg it around half a million already. This confirms something that already existed.</p>
<p>So, the shock is actually a good thing: people who weren&#8217;t aware now know. This is good. There are 600k people who voted PvdV. The publication of such a number is good news, then.</p>
<p>But, are they all racist? Let&#8217;s see, Geert Wilders is the only relevant party that tries to tackle bureaucratic inefficiencies, and given the current political climate of the Netherlands, there is no -WAY- that actual racistic measures get implemented. The &#8216;cordon sanitaire&#8217; around his party (no other party is willing to suffer the PvdV in a coalition) highlights the truth of that notion.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a dangerous ploy, but some of those 600k might just be &#8216;tactical&#8217; votes. That should be worth about 50k votes.</p>
<p>Playing devil&#8217;s advocate for a moment, I think calling PvdV policies &#8216;racistic&#8217; is overstating somewhat. Something like &#8216;Vlaams Blok&#8217; is far larger and much worse, policy-wise. I do not doubt a landslide victory for PvdV might lead to a slippery slope best avoided, but a vote for PvdV&#8217;s immigration policy right now could simply be a vote only for the policies as they were stated right now (which, while harsh, aren&#8217;t racist just yet) &#8211; not what we all suspect would happen if PvdV was allowed to pilot this country on its own. That should be worth another 200k.</p>
<p>Leaves 350k, well below what I suspected. More good news, in other words.</p>
<p>I think a much more telling sign of PvdV&#8217;s ironic name is that they support the newly instated identification laws (requiring you to identify yourself with a government-sanctioned document when asked by police or risk a fine), and they consider fighting terrorism to be more important than preserving civil liberties. How&#8217;s that supporting &#8216;Freedom&#8217; exactly? Suggests to me similar practices as &#8216;the democratic republic of congo&#8217;, or the &#8216;democratic people&#8217;s republic of korea&#8217;. A name which actually opposes what&#8217;s happening.</p>
<p>Then again, the only political parties that -actually- favoured freedom over freedom-restriction legislature were D&#8217;66, Groen Links, and the party for animals. One 3-seat (200,000 votes) has-been, environmentalists (450,000 votes) and extreme environmentalists (140,000 votes). Hm.</p>
<p>That scared me somewhat more &#8211; I was not aware the Dutch didn&#8217;t  care about this issue, nor was I aware the political parties are scared and chasing America in overreacting on issues like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maaike</title>
		<link>http://bomega.com/2006/11/23/600000-racists/comment-page-1/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Maaike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bomega.com/2006/11/23/600000-racists/#comment-442</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re so right. I can&#039;t believe they&#039;re actually called &#039;Party for freedom&#039;. Let&#039;s just hope they&#039;ll disappear in 4 years like the LPF did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re so right. I can&#8217;t believe they&#8217;re actually called &#8216;Party for freedom&#8217;. Let&#8217;s just hope they&#8217;ll disappear in 4 years like the LPF did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

